According to Kant's "categorical imperative," how should one act?

Kant's "categorical imperative" is a foundational concept in his moral philosophy that emphasizes the importance of universalizability in ethical decision-making. The correct approach, which suggests that one should act as though their actions could become a universal law, highlights the idea that ethical actions should be applicable to everyone in society without exception. This means that if you take a particular action, you should be comfortable with the notion that it would be acceptable for everyone else to take that same action. This principle promotes consistency, fairness, and a sense of moral duty that transcends individual circumstances or consequences.

In contrast to the other options, this perspective does not focus on personal happiness or self-interest. For instance, prioritizing personal happiness would lead to a more subjective and potentially self-serving view of morality, which is not in line with Kant's intentions. Similarly, only acting in ways that benefit oneself undermines the ethical principle of universalizability, as it does not take into account the broader implications of one’s actions on others. Making decisions based on the outcome for others could be interpreted as utilitarianism, which differs from Kant's deontological framework that holds that intentions and adhering to universal moral laws are paramount.

Thus, the focus on the capability of actions