Sissela Bok's view on lying suggests what about its consequences?

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Get ready for the UCF MMC2004 Mass Media Final. Utilize flashcards, multiple choice questions with hints, and detailed explanations to enhance your exam preparation. Ace your exam!

Sissela Bok's perspective on lying emphasizes the moral implications associated with deception. She argues that the act of lying is fundamentally problematic due to the inherent deceit involved; it undermines trust and can have far-reaching consequences for interpersonal relationships and societal norms. Bok posits that deception erodes ethical communication, which is crucial for functioning societies. This view highlights that lying impacts not only the person being deceived but also the liar, as lying can create a cycle of dishonesty and mistrust that can damage relationships and moral integrity over time.

The focus on deception as the primary issue aligns with Bok's philosophical approach, where communication should ideally be grounded in truth and transparency. Her argument suggests that while there may be external justifications surrounding the act of lying, the intrinsic deception at its core poses a significant ethical dilemma. Trust, once broken, can lead to long-term consequences that challenge the very fabric of social interaction and morality. This understanding is critical for discussions surrounding ethics in mass media and communication, which is a central theme in the study of mass communication.